Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Actas urol. esp ; 43(9): 467-473, nov. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-185247

RESUMO

Introducción y objetivos: El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el impacto del grado histológico del tumor en la predicción de supervivencia de los tumores primarios T1 G2 y G3 OMS 1973, que han sido clasificados como HG (alto grado) en el sistema de clasificación OMS 2004. Materiales y métodos: Se revisaron retrospectivamente los datos de 481 pacientes con cáncer de vejiga T1HG primario, tratados entre 1986 y 2016 en 2 centros universitarios. Para comparar los grupos se realizaron pruebas de log-rank y análisis de regresión de Cox. Resultados: Noventa y cinco (19,8%) tumores fueron clasificados como G2 y 386 (80,2%) como G3. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 68 meses. Las tasas de recurrencia y progresión fueron 228 (47,5%) y 109 (22,7%) pacientes, respectivamente. Se realizó cistectomía radical en 114 pacientes (23,7%) y hubo 64 (13,3%) casos de muerte cáncer-específica. La tasa de supervivencia libre de recurrencia para G2, G3 y el total de los pacientes fue del 68,7, el 51,2 y el 56,3%, respectivamente, y la para tasa libre de progresión, se obtuvieron unos valores del 89,3, el 73,2 y el 78,1%. Durante todo el período de seguimiento, los pacientes con tumores G3 obtuvieron peores tasas de supervivencia libre de progresión y de recurrencia que los pacientes con tumores G2. En el análisis multivariante, después del ajuste de las características clínicas, el riesgo de recurrencia y progresión para los tumores G3 fue 1,65 y 2,42 veces mayor que para los tumores G2. Conclusiones: Se demostró que los tumores T1G3 se caracterizan por peores tasas de supervivencia libre de progresión y recurrencia en comparación con los cánceres G2


Introduction and objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse prognostic impact of tumour histological grade on survival differences between primary G2 and G3 WHO1973 stage T1 tumours which were graded as HG according to WHO2004 grading system. Materials and methods: Data from 481 patients with primary T1HG bladder cancer who were treated between 1986 and 2016 in 2 university centres were retrospectively reviewed. Log-rank test and Cox regression analysis was performed to compare the groups. Results: 95 (19,8%) tumours were classified as G2 and 386 (80,2%) were G3. Median follow-up was 68 months. The recurrence was observed in 228 (47,5%), and progression in 109 patients (22,7%). Radical cystectomy was performed in 114 pts (23,7%) and there were 64 (13,3%) cancer specific deaths. Recurrence-free rates at 5-years follow-up for G2, G3 and all patients were 68,7%, 51,2% and 56,3% and progression-free rates were 89,3%, 73,2% and 78,1% respectively. For total observation period patients with G3 tumours presented also worse recurrence-free, and progression-free survival levels than patients with G2 tumours. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for clinical features, the risk of recurrence and progression for G3 tumours was 1,65 and 2,42 fold higher than for G2 tumours. Conclusions: It was shown that G3 T1 tumours are characterized by worse recurrence free and progression free survivals when compared to G2 cancers


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Classificações em Saúde , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/classificação , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/classificação , Taxa de Sobrevida , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/classificação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ligante RANK , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Cistoscopia/métodos , 28599 , Análise Multivariada
2.
Actas urol. esp ; 43(8): 445-451, oct. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-192185

RESUMO

Introducción y objetivos: Existen varios estudios con el objetivo de validar las tablas del Club Urológico Español de Tratamiento Oncológico (CUETO). Sin embargo, ninguno de estos estudios se ha centrado en el cáncer de vejiga de alto y muy alto riesgo. El objetivo del presente estudio fue validar externamente el modelo CUETO para predecir la recidiva y la progresión de la enfermedad en el grupo de tumores T1G3 tratados con bacilo Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Pacientes o materiales y métodos: Se analizaron los datos de 414 pacientes con cáncer de vejiga T1G3 primario. Para evaluar la discriminación del modelo se usaron modelos de riesgos proporcionales de Cox y se calcularon los índices de concordancia. Resultados: La mediana de seguimiento fue de 68 meses. Se observó recidiva en 212 (51,2%) y 64 pacientes (15,5%) experimentaron más de un episodio de recurrencia durante el periodo de seguimiento. La progresión del cáncer se observó en 106 pacientes (25,6%), 115 pacientes (27,8%) fueron tratados con cistectomía radical, y hubo 64 (15,5%) muertes por tumor. Para la probabilidad de recidiva y progresión, el índice de concordancia de los modelos CUETO fue de 0,633 y 0,697, respectivamente. Las tablas de CUETO subestimaron significativamente el riesgo de recidiva y marginalmente el riesgo de progresión en el primer año de observación. Durante los 5 años de observación, la tendencia de la recidiva fue mucho menos clara. Por el contrario, hubo una ligera sobreestimación en el riesgo de progresión. El estudio está limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva. Conclusiones: Se demostró que las tablas de riesgo del grupo CUETO logran una discriminación correcta, tanto para la recidiva de la enfermedad como para la progresión, en pacientes con T1G3 tratados con BCG. El modelo de puntuación (CUETO) subestima el riesgo de recidiva del tumor, pero acierta al predecir el riesgo de progresión


Introduction and objectives: Various studies tried to validate Club Urológico Español de Tratamiento Oncológico (CUETO) tables, yet, none of this papers focused on the high and very high risk bladder cancers. The aim of the study was to externally validate the CUETO model for predicting disease recurrence and progression in group of T1G3 tumors treated with BCG immunotherapy. Patients or materials and methods: Data from 414 patients with primary T1G3 bladder cancer were analysed. To evaluate the model discrimination, Cox proportional hazard regression models were created and concordance indexes were calculated. Results: The median follow-up was 68 months. The recurrence was observed in 212 (51.2%) and 64 patients (15.5%) experienced the recurrence more than once during the study follow-up. Progression of the cancer was observed in 106 patients (25.6%). Radical cystectomy was performed in 115 patients (27.8%) and there were 64 (15.5%) cancer specific deaths. For recurrence and progression probability, the concordance index of the CUETO models was 0.633 and 0.697 respectively. CUETO tables underestimated significantly the risk of recurrence and marginally the risk of progression in the first year of observation. For 5 years of observation, the trend for the recurrence was much less clear. On the contrary, there was slight overestimation in the risk of progression. The study is limited by retrospective nature. Conclusions: It was shown that the CUETO risk tables exhibit a fair discrimination for both disease recurrence and progression in T1G3 patients treated with BCG. CUETO scoring model underestimates the risk of tumor recurrence, but predicts well risk of progression


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/terapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Mycobacterium bovis , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Progressão da Doença , Seguimentos , Fatores de Risco
3.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 43(9): 467-473, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31272800

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse prognostic impact of tumour histological grade on survival differences between primary G2 and G3 WHO1973 stage T1 tumours which were graded as HG according to WHO2004 grading system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 481 patients with primary T1HG bladder cancer who were treated between 1986 and 2016 in 2university centres were retrospectively reviewed. Log-rank test and Cox regression analysis was performed to compare the groups. RESULTS: 95 (19,8%) tumours were classified as G2 and 386 (80,2%) were G3. Median follow-up was 68 months. The recurrence was observed in 228 (47,5%), and progression in 109 patients (22,7%). Radical cystectomy was performed in 114 pts (23,7%) and there were 64 (13,3%) cancer specific deaths. Recurrence-free rates at 5-years follow-up for G2, G3 and all patients were 68,7%, 51,2% and 56,3% and progression-free rates were 89,3%, 73,2% and 78,1% respectively. For total observation period patients with G3 tumours presented also worse recurrence-free, and progression-free survival levels than patients with G2 tumours. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for clinical features, the risk of recurrence and progression for G3 tumours was 1,65 and 2,42 fold higher than for G2 tumours. CONCLUSIONS: It was shown that G3 T1 tumours are characterized by worse recurrence free and progression free survivals when compared to G2 cancers.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Organização Mundial da Saúde
4.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 43(8): 445-451, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31155372

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Various studies tried to validate Club Urológico Español de Tratamiento Oncológico (CUETO) tables, yet, none of this papers focused on the high and very high risk bladder cancers. The aim of the study was to externally validate the CUETO model for predicting disease recurrence and progression in group of T1G3 tumors treated with BCG immunotherapy. PATIENTS OR MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 414 patients with primary T1G3 bladder cancer were analysed. To evaluate the model discrimination, Cox proportional hazard regression models were created and concordance indexes were calculated. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 68 months. The recurrence was observed in 212 (51.2%) and 64 patients (15.5%) experienced the recurrence more than once during the study follow-up. Progression of the cancer was observed in 106 patients (25.6%). Radical cystectomy was performed in 115 patients (27.8%) and there were 64 (15.5%) cancer specific deaths. For recurrence and progression probability, the concordance index of the CUETO models was 0.633 and 0.697 respectively. CUETO tables underestimated significantly the risk of recurrence and marginally the risk of progression in the first year of observation. For 5 years of observation, the trend for the recurrence was much less clear. On the contrary, there was slight overestimation in the risk of progression. The study is limited by retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: It was shown that the CUETO risk tables exhibit a fair discrimination for both disease recurrence and progression in T1G3 patients treated with BCG. CUETO scoring model underestimates the risk of tumor recurrence, but predicts well risk of progression.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Modelos Estatísticos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
5.
Neoplasma ; 65(1): 147-152, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29322799

RESUMO

Adjuvant diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are available to reduce the risk of recurrence or progression in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, their indications and efficacy remain a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to analyze therapeutic decisions in patients with primary high-risk NMIBC and to analyze the adherence to clinical guidelines in this field.545 consecutive patients, aged a median of 70.3 years, diagnosed with primary high-risk NMIBC in thirteen urological institutions, were enrolled into this retrospective study. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions after transurethral resection (TUR) were recorded, and predictive factors were analyzed.Restaging TUR was offered to 260 patients (47.7%), up-front intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy to 74 patients (13.6%), immediate radical cystectomy to 38 patients (7.0%), and intravesical chemotherapy with the maintenance therapy to 12 patients (2.2%). No additional procedure was performed in 161 patients (29.5%). The strongest predictive factor for restaging TUR was G3 or high-grade cancer (RR 1.68, p<0.01), for upfront BCG therapy it was carcinoma in situ (RR 3.20, p=0.01), for immediate cystectomy it was stage T1 tumor (RR 3.71, p<0.01), for no additional procedures it was G2 or low-grade cancer (RR 2.18, p<0.01).Clinical management of patients with high-risk NMIBC is suboptimal and not standardized. As this can directly influence patients' survival, urgent improvement of urological care in this field should be considered.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Idoso , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Urol J ; 14(6): 5068-5070, 2017 Nov 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29101762

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Intravesical BCG instillations improve recurrence free survival in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: This is a national survey study, covering 223 urological centres, aimed at reliable identification of BCG availability and implemented treatment patterns. RESULTS: Response rate was 93.7%. BCG was used in 56.5% of urological departments. Another 22.7% referred patients to other hospitals for instillations, while 20.8% did not recommend BCG at all. The most common indications for BCG instillations were as follows: T1 tumours (88.5%), carcinoma in situ (83.6%) and high grade tumours (73.8%). Maintenance therapy was routinely abandoned in 16.4% of centres or was scheduled for <1 year, 1 year, 3 years and 1-3 years in 6.6%, 19.7%, 21.3% and 31.2% of centres, respectively. Continuation of BCGdespite treatment failure in carcinoma in situ cases was considered in 21.3% of departments. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that BCG is underused, while patterns of maintenance and follow-up are suboptimal.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma in Situ/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/provisão & distribuição , Administração Intravesical , Vacina BCG/administração & dosagem , Vacina BCG/provisão & distribuição , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/estatística & dados numéricos , Polônia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Encaminhamento e Consulta
7.
Neoplasma ; 63(4): 642-7, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27268930

RESUMO

Mortality rate from bladder cancer in Europe is the highest in its Central Region. This study is an attempt to find underlying factors by proper characterisation of large cohort of Polish patients with bladder cancer.This is a multicentre study enrolling 1360 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in years 2012-2013 in Poland. All patients underwent transurethral resection of the bladder tumor. Data on staging and grading of all cancers were collected, as well as several demographic and clinical factors were tested for the association with muscle invasiveness of the cancer.Mean age of the cohort was 69.6 years, male to female ratio was 3:1. Bladder cancer stage Ta, T1 and muscle-invasive (MIBC) was diagnosed in 533 (39.2%), 516 (37.9%) and 296 (21.8%) patients, respectively. Patients with MIBC were older (73 vs. 68 years, p<0.05), had lower body mass index (25.4 vs. 26.5 kg/m2, p<0.05), lower haemoglobin concentration (12.2 vs. 13.4 mg/l, p<0.05), longer history of haematuria (86.2 vs. 74.4 days) and longer time interval from first symptom to diagnosis (118.0 vs. 88.2 days), compared to patients with Ta and T1 tumors.High mortality rate from bladder cancer in Central Europe can result from very high incidence of high-risk T1 tumors and high prevalence of prognostic factors of poor survival.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Polônia , Fatores Sexuais , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade
8.
Pol J Pathol ; 65(4): 305-12, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25693085

RESUMO

Staging and grading of bladder cancer have a substantial impact on patients' prognosis. However, due to the relatively low quality and quantity of specimens from transurethral resection (TUR), initial histopathological examination may not be fully reliable. The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of staging and grading in post-TUR and post-radical cystectomy (RC) specimens. Staging and grading in TUR and RC specimens were compared in a group of 181 consecutive patients. All microscopic examinations were performed by dedicated uropathologists. Median time from TUR to RC was 45 days. Additionally, an attempt to identify potential clinical variables influencing the risk of discrepancies was made. In post-RC specimens, the disease was down-staged in 13.8% and up-staged in 54.6% of patients (K = -0.03, p < 0.02). Muscle-invasive bladder cancer was diagnosed in 67.6% of patients initially staged as T1. Cancer was down-graded in 10.3% and up-graded in 17.9% of patients (K = 0.44, p < 0.02). Early onset of disease, female sex and time interval from transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) to RC had no effect on incidence of discrepancies. Pathological post-TUR examination is not predictive for the final stage of cancer. The incidence of under- or overgrading of bladder cancer is significant, and efforts should be made to reduce it.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Idoso , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Cistectomia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Urotélio/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...